Skip to main content

The Waystead Intentions



The name “Waystead” is meant to suggest both a place that is in motion, and at rest; a place both holy and entirely ordinary; a place both absolutely safe and utterly defenseless.
The Waystead is a place dedicated to faithfully and trustfully holding space for God’s Presence to inhabit this everyday world. 

With God’s help our intentions are:

One: To mutually sustain one another in our contemplative practice as God’s friends, through our friendship as anamchara.
Two: To keep and hold the Waystead as a haven of safety and peace, as a clear space to be a preserve of solitude, and as a locus for encountering the Living God.
Three: To go out our door with resolve, and to come in with grace; grounded in God, and observing our intention to carry the spirit of the Waystead with us always, in simple freedom; and to live in open-hearted affinity with Christ, in all beings, abandoning no-one.
Four: To search for mutual understanding and wisdom in our studies and reflections in order to enlarge our spirits, and share with one another the simple delight of learning and discovery, rather than pursuing singular achievement.
Five: To practice greeting joy and wonder, anxiety and frustration, delight and ease, anger and grief as welcome guests; with equanimity and an open heart.
Six: To accept no burden from anyone which is not freely given and freely taken; and to practice working easily in the world, aware of what measure of strength and energy is present and within reach.
Seven: To practice paying attention in calm awareness with a still heart, and bring that awareness into our prayer, our travels, our work, and our rest.
Eight: To practice compassion toward our own and other’s mistakes; to practice awareness of our own and each other’s limitations, and to practice figuring out a path in life which leads to well-being.
Nine: To regularly engage in some rigorous physical art or skill as a practice of embodiment.
Ten: To practice waiting on God, to learn to stop where understanding stops, and remain there.
Eleven: To practice silence, both as an everyday matter of not-talking, and an inward grace of Noble Silence, which is in and of God in whom we live and move and have our Being.
 
 




 


 
 


 


Popular posts from this blog

Temple Mysticism and the Eucharist

(I originally wrote this in November 2015, after reading a book on understanding Jesus's teachings in the light of first century Jewish Temple mysticism. I had been struggling with the cannibalistic implications in the Eucharist of "eating Jesus's body and drinking his blood." It was such a relief to discover this interpretation which connects neatly with the way his disciples would likely have understood the language Jesus was using.)
Eucharist A little bit of research on the internet produced a description of Jewish ritual sacrifice in the time of Jesus. A person, say a woman named Sarah, offers a goat. She buys it and takes it to the priest at the Temple. He examines it to see if it is “perfect,” i.e. healthy and unblemished. He then takes it and slits its throat with the ritual words, “This is Sarah’s blood.” The meaning should obviously be, that this is the blood belonging to Sarah and offered on her behalf. The blood would then be poured out at the base of the …

Zen, Social Activism, and Suffering

I almost always have a feeling of discontent (dukkha) when I encounter a way of looking at the world that exhorts me to define suffering as victimization. This way leads people to become social activists, fighting “injustice,” “poverty,” “violence,” and causes them to want to change “society” to make it a 'better' place. This way of thinking seems to me to miss the point. I call it "bootstrapping,” because it makes me think of the old saying that describes a certain kind of futility by the phrase, “trying to pull yourself up by your own bootstraps.” It can't be done. It seems to me that people often perceive concepts like "injustice" as entities in their own right, with a kind of inimical but impersonal life of their own. This leads to the belief that ideas can do battle in the arena of social activism and when righteousness is the victor, then "society" will change for the better. I see this as a form of delusion, and exactly the sort of error tha…

Thought Tantrums

I've been thinking a bit about emotional states and reactions, trying to figure out if what I personally experience is at all relevant to what other people experience. I've come to believe that it doesn't matter. I know I do a thing that everyone else also seems to do, and that is to think about everything only in reference to myself. I've learned over and over that doing so doesn't improve a thing, and I've even come up with a name for it: "bootstrapping." As in 'trying to pull yourself up by your own bootstraps.' Here's what I've provisionally understood: Attempting to evaluate or make judgments about a thing, or a state, or a condition, based on nothing more than a set of ideas that I have about it (especially any ideas that include the concept of "should") is utterly deluded.
If the condition is entirely internal, and my ideas about it also have no outside referents, then any attempt to change the situation by thinking ab…