Zen, Social Activism, and Suffering
I
almost always have a feeling of discontent (dukkha) when I encounter a way of
looking at the world that exhorts me to define suffering as victimization. This
way leads people to become social activists, fighting “injustice,” “poverty,”
“violence,” and causes them to want to change “society” to make it a 'better'
place. This way of thinking seems to me to miss the point. I call it
"bootstrapping,” because it makes me think of the old saying that describes a
certain kind of futility by the phrase, “trying to pull yourself up by your own
bootstraps.” It can't be done. It seems to me that people often perceive
concepts like "injustice" as entities in their own right, with a kind of
inimical but impersonal life of their own. This leads to the belief that ideas
can do battle in the arena of social activism and when righteousness is the
victor, then "society" will change for the better. I see this as a form of
delusion, and exactly the sort of error that creates suffering in the first
place.
I also
object to the idea that human misery results from conditions such as hunger,
poverty, disease, or violence. These things simply exist as part of the natural
creation. Hunger manifests in our bodies as a need for food. If we do not eat
enough we become thin and eventually we starve. “Poverty”as a word has meaning
only when compared to "Wealth.”If by 'poverty' we mean lacking the necessities
of life, then we must talk about shelter, warmth, clothing, and food. When
those needs are met, then we might begin to consider whether the lack of
meaning and fulfillment in our lives might constitute another kind of poverty.
Disease and injury produce physical pain, and sometimes death comes sooner
because of them. Violence in the sense of forceful action produces no
suffering, unless it causes injury or death to ourselves, or a creature that we
love. If a human being intentionally directs violence to another human being
because of anger or hatred, this causes even greater suffering.
I
understand all this, but I cannot bring myself to make the correlation that
being hungry makes a person a victim of hunger, or that being poor makes a
person a victim of poverty, or that being sick makes a person a victim of
disease, or that being assaulted makes a person a victim of violence. The Latin
word 'victim' originally meant a person sacrificed to a god, with the possible
implication that the person sacrificed had been vanquished or conquered in war.
I find
it interesting and quite revealing that the word "dupe" comes up as the most
common synonym for “victim” in an internet search, and "culprit”as the
antonym. Even if we allow that the meaning has changed over time, still the
word “victim” implies a relationship with a victimizer, or culprit. If, instead
of a person, we make the culprit a vague concept, then we have a ready-made
excuse for failing to shoulder our share of responsibility for the suffering in
the world.
I
believe that suffering does not arise from pain, discomfort, or unfulfilled
needs. I believe that suffering comes from how we react to pain,
discomfort, and unfulfilled needs. We then get lost in the search for some
outside agent with the power to cancel our reactions, without realizing that no
such agent can possibly exist.
On the other hand, I think that whenever any of
us try to alleviate suffering we do a good thing.
I would just like to add my understanding to
the mix. To think of victims without considering the existence of culprits
means that we can only see ourselves as victims and never as culprits. I hope
that we will use caution, and examine our hearts carefully for the symptoms of
distraction and denial which manifest themselves in the feeling of 'not doing
enough,' or the sense of inadequacy that makes us say to ourselves, "We should
do this better,”or“ We shouldn't feel this way." A little, dangerous voice inside us always
tries to tell us that those Other People over there need our help more than
this person right next to us, and we can help by giving money, or by making a
sign and marching down the street, or by signing a petition, or by voting in
every election. We believe they need
our help the most; those far away people that we can't hear or see or smell,
but only imagine, like actors in a movie that made us cry.
Nothing we can do will fix
anything.
Without suffering,
enlightenment would not exist.
Without enlightenment,
suffering would not exist.
Abide all things.
Resist not evil.
Remember the dust we are made
of and to which we will return.
Pay attention.
Carry on.
Comments
Post a Comment