Skip to main content

Backing Through a Door

Today, I’m carrying on from parables to examine miracles, again with a nod to Zen attitudes—this is the story in Mark about the storm on the lake, when the disciples had to wake Jesus because he was sleeping right through all the wind and rain.

I kept thinking in terms of “nots”.

I don’t believe the story is intended to be literal, or metaphorical, or allegorical, or even symbolic. I think the sense of it might be imagined as “backing through a door.”

Here are some words that might connect with our understanding of the story in a pragmatic, non-theoretical way:

v Referential

v Denotational

v Polylateral

o   I invented this word, then looked it up afterward. It’s not in the dictionary, but it is in current use in the context of international diplomacy. (From an article in Public Diplomacy Magazine: “The conduct of relations….in which there is a reasonable expectation of systematic relationships, involving some form of reporting, communication, negotiation, and representation, but not involving mutual recognition as sovereign, equivalent entities.” It reminds me of a word that the author Maggie Ross uses quite often— “Polyvalent.”)

v Inferential

v Figurative

v Connotational

v Metaphrastic

o   As opposed to ‘metaphorical’, in that ‘metaphor’ is relative to the meaning of language, and ‘metaphrastic’ is relative to the function of words and phrases within language.

It occurred to me that the important thing is to read the Bible in a relational context. A context that involves “reporting, communication, negotiation, and representation, but does not involve mutual recognition as sovereign, equivalent entities.”

To play with an extended not-metaphor, lets experiment with encountering the Bible as an entity which engages in reporting, communication, negotiation, and representation; all of which are activities that lead to some sort of mutual recognition, just not recognition as sovereign, equivalent entities.
If you are shaking your head at this point, and starting to get a headache, let’s change the parameters.
When it comes to the accounts of miracles, don’t rush to read them as if you already know the end of the story. When I read today’s story, what reached out its hand to me were the phrases, “They took him just as he was” and “Who can this be?”
The story itself ‘took me just as I was’, and asked me that very same question— “Who can this be?” I’m not going to tell you what my answer was, or if I even answered at all.

Let the Bible read you.

Open yourself to it

as if you are a well-loved storybook

with dog-eared pages and sticky stuff on the color plates.

Give it time to look at the pictures;

turn the pages when it pleases;

fold down the corners at its favorite places.

Accept its nomination.

Negotiate with it

as mutual envoys; ambassadors; attachés

of far away lands with unusual and interesting customs.

Let it draw its own inferences from you;

make its own motions after it’s ready;

recognize you when it’s time to hear your report.

Agree to its terms; stand and deliver—

Give it everything you own, if that’s what it wants.

Take whatever it offers, if that’s what you want.

Popular posts from this blog

Which Way The Wind Blows

Lectionaries are funny things— weird, abstruse little lists of biblical passages by number, sort of like tide tables or bus schedules. Today’s Lectionary passages (for 3-9-2018, the week of the third Sunday in Lent) are: Psalm 88; Genesis 47:1-26; 1 Corinthians 9:16-27; and Mark 6:47-56
About a month ago I posted a reflection in response to Abbess Jane’s Lectionary Musings blog on the same passage from Corinthians as the one listed for today in the Daily Office Readings Lectionary (BCP). That was supposed to be the reading for the 6th Sunday of Epiphany, according to +Jane, but I just can’t find it anywhere. I looked up Epiphany 6 in both the Daily Office Lectionary and the Revised Common Lectionary—not there. It’s not the reading from the Lindisfarne Community’s A Way of Living Lectionary for either Year 1 or 2 either. Oh well.
I was never the sort of autist who is fascinated by such things as bus schedules. I am much more inclined to be enthralled by maps. I wonder if I could make a L…

That'll Do

On Sunday the Psalm was the famous 23rd.  I’ve heard it so many times that I never expected anything new to come wandering across the border from that hinterland, but there ya go. So, the liminal phrase is this: “Your rod and your staff they comfort me,” or as the CJB says, “your rod and staff reassure me.”
I got to thinking, “Well, just exactly how does a shepherd use a staff and a rod?” The staff is used to guide the sheep and to catch them. Traditional staffs used in the UK have horn crooks with a sharp curled tip, which I suspect is designed to catch in the fleece. The rod was essentially a club used to defend against predators, but also as a goad to correct the sheep.
I’ve never really identified with the sheep; I mean they are really not very smart and don’t have much of a survival instinct. I also have misgivings about identifying myself as the shepherd of the sheep. So, I asked myself, “What other role might I fill in the whole sheep-shepherd metaphor?” and it came to me: Shee…

The Next Dance

1 Corinthians 13:1-13 Complete Jewish Bible (CJB)
Love is patient and kind, not jealous, not boastful,
not proud, rude or selfish, not easily angered,
and it keeps no record of wrongs.
Love does not gloat over other people’s sins
but takes its delight in the truth.
Love always bears up, always trusts,
always hopes, always endures.

I’ve read this over about five times now, and it keeps on growing in my mind. The above is only a part of the verse cited, but it’s the part that kept reaching out and poking me. It’s the part that I felt was reading me; the part that was peering into my heart to see what is going on in there. It’s the part that sat down in front of me with a questioning look on its face, put its chin in its hand, and looked at me without saying anything. And kept on looking.
Eventually I started noticing specific things; I started trying to see what the verse was looking at in me. I noticed that it started out by talking about what love is; then what it isn’t; then back …