World Without End
I just had a vivid insight while I was scrolling through
Facebook and marveling at how people get so deeply invested in creating
discontent. It looks to me as if they go deliberately looking for things that
upset them; opinions they disagree with; or events that reveal injustice or
discrimination. People seem irresistibly drawn to faulty logic and
semantically-empty-but-emotion-laden slogans, and once they’ve adopted some
reckless, thoughtless ideology, they proceed to self-righteously blame everyone
and anyone who doesn’t agree with them for everything that is wrong with this
world.
Enough about that though, and on to my little realization. I
have to explain a little background first though.
A while back I took Buddhist vows in a ceremony called
“receiving jukai.” If you want to read the principles I vowed to practice and
uphold, they are posted in a page on this blog called “New Seeds Priory Zen
Precepts.” Since the very beginning of my effort to study and practice in a
community of other practitioners, and seek out a teacher, I’ve been troubled by
a style of Zen teaching I call “self-help Zen.” This is the brand of Zen that
sells itself as a personal coping method; advertises itself as a way in which a
practitioner can achieve “enlightenment” and an end to their own personal
suffering. I’ve always felt on an intuitive level that this approach is a
deadly perversion of Zen. My discernment of Buddha’s insight into suffering,
and the causes of suffering, is based on my understanding that he wanted to end
the suffering of other people, and not
merely relieve his own misery and discontent. It was their unhappiness which made him feel such compassion that he vowed
to become enlightened or die trying. He wanted to save the whole world from the consequences of humankind’s rage, misery,
discontent, and inconsolable grief.
So, because I am a Christian as well as a Buddhist, I wanted
to declare my intention in both contexts. “To seek and serve Christ in all
persons” gets lived out in the Four Vows that all Zen practitioners recite, as
a declaration of the essence of their practice:
Sentient
beings are numberless, I vow to save them.
Desires are
inexhaustible, I vow to put an end to them.
The dharmas
are boundless, I vow to master them.
The Buddha
way is unsurpassable, I vow to attain it.
It’s quite clear from the sentence construction that these
intentions are literally impossible to achieve. That is exactly the understanding that the framers of these vows intended.
They wanted us to understand that there is no end to the practice. I thought of
adjusting the language to read “I vow to keep on— saving beings, ending
desires; mastering wisdom; attaining the Way—'world without end’.” (I love the
phrase, “world without end.” It’s only in the King James and the Geneva Bibles,
but the language in both of them is so beautiful that I often turn to them by
preference.)
Isaiah
45:16-18 1599 Geneva Bible— 17 But Israel shall be saved in the
Lord, with an everlasting salvation: ye shall not be ashamed nor confounded
world without end.
That gets us back to my insight this morning:
Buddha saw deeply into the causes of suffering, and he saw
how to end it. My suddenly shifting perspective made me see something new. The
reason for ending our own suffering is not for our own sake, it’s so that we
can stop inflicting our suffering on
everyone else!
I felt like I’d
taken a leap off a cliff and suddenly found myself flying—and laughing.
I do think I need to unpack it a bit more, though. Going
back to my displeasure at all of the petty temper-tantrums on Facebook: My
disgruntlement prompted the thought process that in turn led to my
little moment of realization. As I read the cantankerous posts, my internal
thought process looked a bit like this:
“This is so
annoying and upsetting.”
“Why are
people so mean?”
“I wish that
they wouldn’t spread all this misery around and infect everyone else with it!”
“Hold on a
minute!”
“If other
people can infect me with wretchedness and discontent, then I can also infect them with wretchedness and discontent!”
“Oh boy, that
means that if I get wound up in it, then between us we can achieve a magnification
of misery— ‘world without end’!”
“Oops, that
would be a definite abuse of my promise to end suffering.”
“Well, now
what?”
“Wait! I get
it!”
“In order to
stop contaminating other people with my wretchedness and discontent, I have to abolish
my own discontent.”
“Aha! That’s
the reason for the practice!”
“It’s not to increase my own happiness; it’s not to give me the benefit of
enlightenment; it’s not to improve my
happiness and serenity; and it’s not in the least about me ‘getting woke’!”
“Crap, it’s
simple isn’t it?”
“What a
laugh! Isn’t there a thing in the Bible about taking the log out of your own
eye before you try to take a splinter out of someone else’s eye?”
“Oh. Duh.”
(This is the passage I remembered, as it’s
interpreted in a Bible called The Message: “Don’t
pick on people, jump on their failures, criticize their faults— unless, of
course, you want the same treatment. That critical spirit has a way of
boomeranging. It’s easy to see a smudge on your neighbor’s face and be
oblivious to the ugly sneer on your own. Do you have the nerve to say, ‘Let me
wash your face for you,’ when your own face is distorted by contempt? It’s this
whole traveling road-show mentality all over again, playing a holier-than-thou
part instead of just living your part. Wipe that ugly sneer off your own face,
and you might be fit to offer a washcloth to your neighbor.”)
“Misery loves company.”
“If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em!”
Not beating; not joining—
Not starting; not finishing—
It all ends right here!
I’ll plop
my bottom
down
on my cushion,
and keep on
sitting on it
until
our bottomless misery
pops
like bubble wrap
from an empty package.
Comments
Post a Comment