The Dance of Call and Answer
I am not reading the Lectionary today.
I have done something momentous and irreversible— I started
feeding birds.
I bought a feeder that attaches to the outside of the
picture window in my kitchen. I thought it would be amusing and delightful to
watch birds right there on the other side of my window.
It took the birds two months to find the feeder but, once
they did, events spiraled out of all control.
I have two kinds of birds at my feeder: House Finches and
House Sparrows. The sparrows live in a long-established colony in the ivy that
grows on my chimney. They are a constant presence all year round.
I don’t know where the finches come from but they can’t
really compete with the sparrows, and so they tend to flit into range in stealth
mode, snatch a beakful of seed, and execute a strategic retreat.
New Year’s Eve was very cold, and the birds’ behavior that
day showed me very clearly the final phase of a progression that I realized had
begun the very moment the birds first discovered the feeder.
At first it took several days for the sparrows to empty the
feeder. They came in one’s and two’s— demurely pecking and fluffing their
feathers; petite and charming, they were. There was a little pushing and
shoving and a few skids along the floor of the feeder, scattering seeds into
the air. It was cute.
Then slowly they became more voracious. Four or five at once
in the feeder, and four or five more flapping and sideswiping each other in the
air. Scrabbling and clinging to the edge of the window frame; flailing each
other with their wings; coming and going in a cloud of greasy seed-hulls and
dislodged down-feathers. It was still cute, though.
By Christmas, I had to fill the feeder every day, and I
realized something. I was now beholden to these birds. I hadn’t noticed. It
dawned on me the day I was mildly burdened with guilt because I had not filled
the feeder, and the birds had gone without for a day— these birds were now
depending on me. They had expectations and hopes which I had the power to
either crush or fulfill. And they were so
hungry!
Just yesterday I watched them frantically gobbling seeds as
though they were possessed— insatiable, voracious, obsessed little barbarians,
they were.
This morning I came into the kitchen and there was one
forlorn, feather-inflated bird sitting in the empty feeder with its back to me
in what seemed a silent accusation. My morning routine was disrupted, because
suddenly my chore of filling the feeder took on enormous significance. It felt
like an emergency—an urgent situation demanding immediate action. I delayed
making my coffee, hurried and fed the dog, and then filled the feeder. My
comfortable routine was all unraveled, and I felt out-of-sorts, as though
something crucial was missing from the pattern. Uneasy, I was.
On the other hand, I was wryly amused. I thought of the
understanding common among some indigenous peoples that a healer or physician
incurs an obligation toward anyone whose life they have saved. They become
responsible in some intangible way for the remainder of that person’s
existence, since that person would not be alive if it weren’t for the healer’s
intervention. I like that notion. It’s not a matter of tit for tat, or quid pro
quo; in fact, it’s the exact opposite. The patient does not owe the doctor; the
doctor is obligated to the patient. The patient’s life was once in the healer’s
hands, and so in some manner it remains there. I didn’t necessarily save those
birds’ lives, but I certainly changed their world. I introduced something that
gradually altered their reality, and became part of how-it-is. Once that
happened, the repercussions of failing to maintain the new state of affairs
became quite clear. There really was no possibility of going back.
This morning, in that half-lit consciousness just before I’m
fully awake, I made a connection between the birds and Christ. Nebulous, it
was, and uncanny. I’m not sure I can describe it.
I had somehow become convinced that our work as Christians
is to rescue Christ.
I saw how the Incarnation had reordered the pattern of
reality for human beings in much the same way as I had altered the pattern of
reality for my birds. There is no going back. It’s just not that simple, though—the
birds had transformed my reality as well, shifting my boundaries and reshaping
my choices.
I don’t believe that the Incarnation changed the nature of
Creation. Instead, I think that it manifested the very essence of Reality, the
same Essence that has always existed and always will, from before Time and
after the end of Time. What the Incarnation did was simply to bring that
Essence to our attention in a way that ever afterward could not be ignored, any
more than I could ignore my empty bird-feeder. It shifted our boundaries and
reshaped our choices. It blurred the distinction between the feeder and the
fed. It incurred an obligation from the healer to the patient — and here is the
big deal—
I saw the Christ Event as the patient, and humankind as the
healer.
I’m not sure why, but I know it had to do with my sparrows,
and my obligation to them to keep that feeder eternally filled. My original
impulse to feed the birds resulted in a shift in the pattern of reality; not just
the birds’ reality, but mine. Choices changed; hopes formed; boundaries
shifted; duties arose. Because the birds came to my feeder, and I saw them and
took delight in them; because I was awed and disconcerted by the power of their
hunger and their insatiable appetite; because I was unsettled by their
unexpected claim on my reliability, my world changed.
What if that is exactly what happened in the Incarnation?
What if God manifested as God-made-human so that human
beings would be moved to fill the feeder? What if God so loved the world that
the feeder gets voraciously emptied every day by the power of God’s Love? What
if it’s our job to fill that feeder over and over again until the end of time?
What if that was the whole point of God-as-helpless-child, and God-as-innocent-victim?
What if God was being literal in the words of Christ—
“Whenever you do this for
the least of these, you do it for me”?
Matthew 25— 35 For
I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to
drink, I was a stranger and you made me your guest, 36 I
needed clothes and you provided them, I was sick and you took care of me, I was
in prison and you visited me.’ 37 Then the people who
have done what God wants will reply, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed
you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38 When
did we see you a stranger and make you our guest, or needing clothes and
provide them? 39 When did we see you sick or in prison,
and visit you?’ 40 The King will say to them, ‘Yes! I
tell you that whenever you did these things for one of the least important of
these brothers of mine, you did them for me!’
So I guess my bird-feeder is a metaphor of God’s Love—
and
it isn’t about whether or not I fill it,
and
it’s not about how delightful the birds are,
and
it’s not even about finishing what I started, even if
there’s no end to it.
No,
it’s about the hollow feeling in my own chest at the
sight of the empty feeder,
and
it’s about my reaction to that lone, puffed up bird with
its back to me,
and
it’s about the dance of call and answer,
and
it doesn’t matter in the least which one came first.
No,
it’s about knowing that it does matter, and it is real—
We are meant to save Christ,
and once done,
be beholden to God-in-the-world
forever after.
Comments
Post a Comment